…but mostly the nonbinary people….
i got used to the whole debate around trans and cis… how trans ‘others’ trans ladies, trans men and trans nonbinary people.
oh… i think my head just exploded already.
basically… ‘trans’ others those who are not ‘normal’ (or cis as the trans world has decided to call the gender stationary majority)
So why does nonbinary not ‘other’ those who are erm…not binary? If it does is this considered not a bad thing becuase as any fule knows nonbinary is actually the majority they just don’t accept it yet?
Come the gender identity revolution there will still be people who would prefer to stand at each end of the gender identity spectrum and use the lables ‘men’ and ‘women’…. so what will all the people elsewhere on the spectrum be? I guess just people… and those at either end ‘binary people’…except that would ‘other’ them.
Is this just like feminism where its not really about being equal but about changing ends and the oppressor becoming the oppressed?
is ‘othering’ really a bad thing…. in a world where difference is celebrated as opposed to villified it wouldn’t be… but i guess its a process -time spent wearing the victim hat becuase of difference… expecting and courting negative response.
That then changes to a point where difference becomes something to be proud of….becuase the difference is mostly accepted.
different good…. too different not good.
it’s all so complicated
i wish people would just get on with being people and stop dividing and subdividing minority groups to claim their own square inch of masochistic otherness…. it quite spoils my afternoon.